Skip to main content
React developers · mid-level and senior · LATAM

React developers vetted for the Hooks era.

Modern React placements need more than “knows React.” Server Components, Suspense data flow, hydration tradeoffs, design-system discipline, build performance — the surface is wider than it was. sourceBOLD screens every applicant against your role, then meets each candidate, contacts their references and reviews their code before you see them.

01 · how we vet React developers

Screened for your role, then met by us.

Screening

Every applicant answers questions about their skills, experience and how they like to work, and is ranked against your role. Only the applicants who come through screening move on to our review.

We meet them

We meet every candidate before you do and check their English, so you know they can hold their own in your standups and code reviews. We also confirm their React experience is what they say it is.

References + code

We contact their references and review their code, so you aren’t taking their résumé on trust.

3.9% of applicants make it through screening and our review. The full process is in how we vet candidates.

02 · what a placement looks like

Week 1 — shipping by Friday.

  • DAY 1Repo access, dev environment running, SOW kickoff doc reviewed. Standup attendance starts on day one.
  • DAY 2–4Picks up a “good first issue” — typically a UI polish ticket or a self-contained bugfix. Your tech lead reviews the PR. Comms happen in your team’s existing Slack + standup rhythm — no sourceBOLD-side intermediary.
  • DAY 5First feature ship — typically something that touches both client + server code so the next PR has more surface area to lean into.
  • WEEK 2+Real feature work. Integrates into the standup and code-review rotations. Treated like a full member of the team — because that’s what they are.

The contracting layer sits underneath all of this. From your team’s day-to-day, the developer is a React contractor on Slack. The cross-border tax shape, the bi-weekly invoice cycle, the cross-border payout to the developer — those are sourceBOLD’s operational concerns, not your team’s.

03 · in-house React vs sourceBOLD

Side-by-side, where each model fits.

Building in-house
sourceBOLD
Time-to-first-ship
6–12 weeks (job posts → interviews → offer → start)
Engagement-ready in as little as 18 days
Vetting depth
Your team's interviewing capacity
Screened against your role, then met by us: English, experience, references and a code review
Compensation shape
US React salary + benefits + equity
Monthly Service Fee per developer; developer-favored split; no benefits, no equity
Termination
Severance + at-will employment limits
30-day notice; unused days refunded, prorated
Cross-border tax
N/A (US payroll)
sourceBOLD absorbs; you pay in US dollars
Time-zone overlap
Full (8 hours)
4–8 hours US overlap (Americas-only sourcing)
Project-management overhead
You own it
You own it — no PM bundled in
Engagement length
Open-ended employment
Month-to-month; renew per SOW
04 · when each one fits

Pick by the situation, not by the pitch.

  • Pick in-house if you need a full-time React engineer with benefits, equity, and an at-will employment relationship.
  • Pick a US-based contractor if you need US-only data residency or a very short engagement (under four weeks).
  • Pick sourceBOLD if you need mid-level or senior React capacity on month-to-month engagement, with published pricing and 4–8 hours of US time-zone overlap — typical Series-A-to-C scaling scenario.
Ready when you are

Scale your team.
Surge ahead.

One intro call, no sales pitch. Pre-vetted finalists, not a stack of résumés. First standup in weeks, not months.

See how it worksNo card. Same-day response.