Side-by-side, Philippines or the Americas.
CoDev sources in the Philippines (UTC+8) and offers a managed- services model across four engagement tiers — from individual experts the client manages directly to fully turnkey CoDev- accountable delivery. sourceBOLD is Americas-only (4–8h US overlap) with a month-to-month contractor engagement. Different geographies, different overlap shapes; the right answer depends on whether your team runs synchronous standups or async handoffs.
- Pick CoDev if you want a fully managed-service tier where the vendor owns delivery accountability (CoDev’s "Managed Service" and "CoTeams" tiers).
- Pick CoDev if your procurement gates on SOC 2 + ISO certifications — CoDev carries both; sourceBOLD doesn’t.
- Pick sourceBOLD if your engineering rhythm depends on live US-business-hours overlap (standups, synchronous code review, pairing) and you want a contractor engagement, not a managed-service vendor.
The honest table — two geographies, two engagement shapes.
CoDev data from their public site (codev.com, codev.com/about-us, codev.com/software-delivery). sourceBOLD column tracks the platform’s actual contractual + system behavior. The SOC 2 row is honest on both sides — CoDev has it, sourceBOLD doesn’t (yet).
Three differences your team will feel daily.
Time-zone overlap as a contract term
Philippines is UTC+8 — 12–16 hours offset from US Eastern. CoDev explicitly notes their model "supports partial or full time-zone overlap based on your needs," with many clients opting for partial overlap and Philippine staff working night shifts for real-time collaboration. sourceBOLD’s Americas-only sourcing delivers 4–8 hours of overlap with the US business day by construction — no night shifts needed, live standups work without scheduling gymnastics.
Pricing transparency
sourceBOLD publishes typical starting prices on /what-it-costs and writes the exact monthly Service Fee into the SOW at signing. CoDev’s pricing is sales-gated behind a "70% cost savings" headline that doesn’t translate to a comparable rate before the discovery call.
Contractor engagement, not managed services
CoDev’s positioning spans staff augmentation through fully turnkey managed services. sourceBOLD is single-tier: contractor engagement, you direct the work, no managed- service overhead. For teams that already have engineering leadership and want to plug in contractors rather than delegate delivery accountability, the operational fit is different.
The honest counter — scale, certifications, and managed-service depth.
SOC 2 + ISO certifications
CoDev carries SOC 2 and ISO certifications that sourceBOLD doesn’t (yet). For enterprise procurement processes that gate on either, CoDev removes friction we don’t. We use encryption at rest, a tamper-evident audit chain, and state-privacy-aligned data handling — but those aren’t the same as the audited certifications CoDev has.
Managed-service depth
If you want a vendor to absorb full delivery accountability across engineering, ops, and back-office — CoDev’s "Managed Service" and "CoTeams" tiers cover that. sourceBOLD deliberately leaves delivery accountability with the client. For buyers who want a turnkey partner rather than contractor augmentation, CoDev’s model fits.
Pick by the situation, not by the pitch.
- You want a managed-service tier where the vendor owns delivery accountability.
- SOC 2 / ISO certifications are a procurement gate.
- Your team runs async-handoff workflows and can tolerate a 12–16h time-zone offset.
- You want vendor-bundled ops/marketing/back-office services beyond engineering.
- Your team runs live US-business-hours collaboration (standups, sync code review).
- You want published pricing in the contract, not a sales-gated quote.
- You want a contractor engagement — you direct the work, no managed-service overhead.
- 4–8h US overlap is a working-day requirement, not a nice-to-have.
CoDev-vs-sourceBOLD FAQ.
Why does time-zone overlap matter for engineering placements?
Synchronous collaboration — standups, code review, pair programming — works cleanly when both sides share working hours. With a 12–16h offset (Philippines vs US), one side works nights or the model becomes async-only. sourceBOLD's 4–8h Americas overlap means a placement sits inside your team's standup rhythm by default. CoDev's model handles the gap by having Philippine staff work shifted schedules; both are legitimate, just different working conditions.
Why doesn't sourceBOLD carry SOC 2 like CoDev?
sourceBOLD hasn't completed a SOC 2 audit. We use encryption at rest, a tamper-evident audit chain on sensitive operations, and state-privacy-aligned data handling, but those aren't the same as an audited certification. If SOC 2 is a procurement gate, CoDev has it; we don't pretend to.
How does sourceBOLD's pricing compare to CoDev's?
sourceBOLD publishes typical starting prices on /what-it-costs and writes the exact monthly Service Fee into the SOW at signing. CoDev's pricing is sales-gated behind a "70% cost savings" marketing claim. Both are senior-developer pricing; the published-vs-quote difference is what your procurement team will feel.
Does sourceBOLD offer managed-services delivery like CoDev?
No. sourceBOLD's model is contractor engagement — we source and place the developer; you direct the work and own delivery accountability. CoDev's "Managed Service" tier absorbs delivery accountability for clients who want a single vendor owning outcomes. Different scope by design.
Does sourceBOLD source in the Philippines?
No. sourceBOLD is Americas-only — we source developers across Latin America, with the US time-zone overlap (4–8 hours) that comes with it. If Philippines-based placements are a hard requirement, CoDev is the better fit.
Scale your team.
Surge ahead.
One intro call, no sales pitch. Pre-vetted finalists, not a stack of résumés. First standup in weeks, not months.